Apply Now
Get in Touch
ionm

How Many Rooms Is Your IONM Supervisor Watching? Verifying Remote Oversight in Outsourced Neuromonitoring

/ News / By

In nearly every outsourced intraoperative neuromonitoring arrangement, a surgical neurophysiologist works in the operating room and a supervising professional interprets the same data from somewhere else. Hospitals verify the first person carefully and frequently never ask a single question about the second. The question that matters most is how many cases that supervising professional is covering at the same time as yours, because the professional society guideline governing this practice explicitly anticipates concurrent supervision and sets no numeric limit on it, while Medicare, addressing the identical practice, requires undivided attention to a single patient for the service it will pay for.

Both of those statements are true at once. A hospital that has not asked which standard its provider operates to has not verified its supervision model.

What the remote supervision model actually is

Two roles deliver IONM. The intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring technologist, in the room, applies electrodes, runs the equipment, and maintains data acquisition. The intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring professional, referred to as the IONM-P in the guideline literature, provides real-time supervision, interpretation, and diagnostic or interventional recommendations. The professional may be physically present in the operative suite, may work remotely through telemedicine, or may work in a blend of the two depending on patient care needs.

Two points about the professional role are worth stating plainly because they are commonly misunderstood.

First, the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring recognizes, citing American Medical Association policy H-410.957, that performing IONM at a professional level, meaning supervision, interpretation, and intervention, constitutes the practice of medicine.

Second, the supervising professional is not required by the guideline to be a physician. The guideline states that the professional engages in patient care “whether or not the IONM-P is a physician or other qualified healthcare professional practitioner.” A hospital assuming that a neurologist is interpreting every case is making an assumption the guideline does not make for it. Ask.

What the guideline permits, and what it deliberately leaves open

The current ASNM professional practice guideline was approved in February 2018 and supersedes the January 2013 version. Anyone quoting the older document, and material from it still circulates, is quoting a superseded guideline.

On remote practice, the guideline is permissive and explicit: “The guidance here is applicable without regard to the physical location of the IONM-P.” Telemedicine is described as having “grown over time as an efficient and effective method of improving access to subspecialist IONM patient care.”

It does set technical expectations. When the professional is not in the operative suite, the guideline states “it is expected that a continuous, HIPAA-compliant feed of all live data being recorded will be available to the IONM-P for contemporaneous interpretation,” and that “at minimum, direct voice access (via ‘land-line’ or cellular network) for perioperative communication with the surgical team is expected.”

Note what that requires and what it does not. It requires a continuous live data feed, not intermittent snapshots, and it requires direct voice access to the surgical team. It does not require video of the operating room, and it does not specify a maximum response time. Those are gaps a hospital can close by contract.

The guideline is also emphatic that supervision must be contemporaneous. The professional “must remain continuously available to perform intraoperative responsibilities in real time throughout the procedure,” and it states directly that “retrospective, or ‘after-the-fact’ interpretation and reporting, is of negligible benefit to the patient or the surgeon.”

The concurrency question, stated honestly

Here is the passage that hospital leaders should read for themselves. Under the heading addressing IONM during concurrent cases, the guideline states:

“It is anticipated that the IONM-P may be responsible for oversight in concurrent surgical procedures (as may be the case with anesthesia care). The IONM-P must judge his or her maximum capacity based on the mix of case complexity and other factors such as connectivity for telemedicine providers. Sufficient attention must be apportioned to each case such that all duties of the IONM-P are maintained for all cases. It is further recognized that cases of greater complexity may require personal attendance in the operating room.”

Three things follow. Concurrent supervision is expressly contemplated, not tolerated as a compromise. No number appears anywhere in the document. And the obligation to determine capacity is placed on the individual professional, not on the employer and not on the hospital.

The guideline is candid about why the practice exists, noting that “IONM service demand far exceeds the limited supply of qualified subspecialized providers, which often necessitates telemedicine oversight of multiple simultaneous cases.”

It is worth being fair about what this means. A well-run remote supervision program with an experienced professional covering a small number of routine cases may deliver better interpretation than a hospital could obtain otherwise, particularly at facilities that cannot attract a subspecialist in person. Concurrency is not inherently a defect. But because the standard is self-judgment, the practical ceiling in any given organization is set by that organization’s staffing model and culture, not by an external rule. That is exactly the kind of variable a hospital should inspect rather than assume.

One more caution about how to use the guideline. It states of itself: “These Guidelines are an attempt to define minimum IONM-P practices under typical circumstances. Because each surgical procedure has unique circumstances, a lack of adherence to some aspects of these Guidelines cannot be construed to imply negligence or breach of duty.” It is a consensus document with no evidence grading scheme, and it says so.

Medicare answered the same question differently

The billing rules tell a story the marketing material does not, and they are the most useful independent check available to a hospital.

CPT code 95941 describes remote or nearby monitoring and, as CMS put it, “allows a physician to monitor multiple Medicare beneficiaries (patients) simultaneously.” CMS created HCPCS code G0453 in the CY 2013 Physician Fee Schedule final rule specifically “in response to concerns about” that feature. G0453 “can be billed only for undivided attention by a monitoring physician to a single beneficiary, and not for simultaneous attention by the monitoring physician to more than one patient.” CPT 95941 is not valid for submission to Medicare.

The operational rules follow from that. G0453 is billed in 15-minute units, no more than four units in a 60-minute period, and total billed units may not exceed the total time available. A physician may bill one unit when at least eight minutes of monitoring to a single beneficiary are furnished. Non-continuous time directed at one patient during a single session may be summed.

The most revealing passage in the CMS guidance is its worked example of a physician who monitors a Medicare patient exclusively for ten minutes, is then called to also monitor a privately insured patient in a second operating theater, and covers both simultaneously for twenty minutes. Medicare pays for the ten exclusive minutes. It does not pay for the twenty simultaneous minutes, “because the physician did not provide exclusive attention to the Medicare beneficiary.” CMS adds that where Medicare and non-Medicare patients are monitored during the same time span, the physician “must document and differentiate between the exclusive, continuous minutes of time spent monitoring the Medicare patient and other non-Medicare patient minutes.”

That requirement is the practical lever. A provider that bills Medicare for remote supervision must already be tracking, per case and per minute, when its supervising professional was exclusively attending to one patient. The data exists. A hospital can ask for it.

Credentialing and privileging: what the guideline expects of you

The guideline places an explicit expectation on hospitals, and it is one that many medical staff offices have not operationalized for remote professionals: “When evaluating requests related to credentialing and privileging for IONM, hospitals are strongly encouraged to demand evidence of an appropriate combination of board certification or re-certification, training, experience, licensure (where applicable), and continuing education.”

It further states that the qualified professional “is always expected to maintain appropriate hospital credentialing and appropriate privileges at all facilities where they perform the duties of an IONM-P,” with exceptions contemplated only for unexpected or emergent situations when a credentialed professional is unavailable. Each professional must comply with state scope of practice and licensure requirements where care is delivered, which for a remote professional means the state where the surgery occurs.

On board certification the guideline is direct: it “remains necessary to practice as an IONM-P, and must be secured within the board-eligible period as defined by the relevant board,” with an ASNM standard of seven years where no time-based standard otherwise exists.

The practical question for a medical staff office is simple and rarely asked: is every supervising professional who covers our cases individually credentialed and privileged here, and licensed in this state? If the provider cannot produce that roster on request, the arrangement is not what the hospital believes it to be.

For the in-room technologist, the ABRET Certification in Neurophysiologic Intraoperative Monitoring, or CNIM, is the recognized credential. ABRET’s eligibility pathways combine education and documented surgical case experience, with requirements that have been increasing. Note that the ASNM professional practice guideline does not itself specify a technologist credential; it defers to separate technical standards. So a hospital that wants CNIM required rather than encouraged needs to say so in its contract.

Documentation and reporting: a concrete standard to hold to

The guideline specifies eight elements the professional’s report should contain: the patient, surgeon, and IONM care team identified; the surgical procedures performed; the modalities recorded with a description of baseline responses; neural topographical or neuro-navigational data where applicable; details of any significant changes in responses during the procedure; interventional measures recommended where there was concern for injury; final responses obtained; and details of post-operative neurological status where possible and relevant.

That list is a ready-made audit tool. Pull ten recent reports and check them against it.

On data, the guideline expects that representative samples of recorded modalities be archived so the intraoperative course “can be adequately reconstructed,” that all stimulus-evoked responses be archived with associated commentary, and that screen saves of representative pathologic discharges and recurring artifacts be archived “so that the case may be thoroughly understood by any reviewer at a later time.” Reconstructability is the standard. Ask what your provider retains, for how long, and how quickly you could obtain a full case record if a deficit were discovered postoperatively.

Note one gap. The guideline sets no requirement to document or archive communications between the professional and the technologist, or time spent per case. If you want a record of when the alert was raised and when the surgeon was told, put it in the contract.

What to require in writing

  • The maximum number of concurrent cases any supervising professional will cover while covering yours, stated as a number, with an escalation process when it is exceeded
  • Identification and credentialing of every supervising professional who may cover your cases, with state licensure where your surgery occurs
  • Board certification status for each, and the certification body
  • Whether supervising professionals are employed or contracted, and whether they supervise for other organizations concurrently
  • A continuous HIPAA-compliant live data feed, with a defined maximum interruption tolerance and a fallback procedure
  • Direct voice access to the surgical team, with a maximum response time to a request for consultation
  • A maximum interval from significant signal change recognition to surgeon notification, and a record of both timestamps
  • Reports containing the eight ASNM elements, delivered within a stated timeframe
  • Data retention sufficient to reconstruct any case, with a stated retrieval turnaround
  • Case-level supervision records available to the hospital on audit

Questions worth asking in diligence

  • How many cases is a supervising professional permitted to cover simultaneously, and who enforces it?
  • Are your supervising professionals physicians in every case? If not, what credentials do the non-physician professionals hold?
  • Do your supervising professionals perform this work exclusively for your organization, or also for others?
  • When you bill Medicare, which code do you use for remote supervision, and can you show us how exclusive attention is documented?
  • What is your median time from signal change to surgeon notification, and how is it measured?
  • Can we see ten recent de-identified reports from our own cases?

Where SpecialtyCare fits

SpecialtyCare’s IONM model pairs an in-room surgical neurophysiologist with an IONM physician who accesses the same monitoring data in real time through telemedicine. SpecialtyCare employs more than 500 surgical neurophysiologists across 42 states and supports more than 115,000 patients each year. Its surgical neurophysiologists are 100 percent CNIM and it reports the highest percentage of diplomates of the American Board of Neurophysiologic Monitoring and PhDs. It employs approximately 50 physicians with experience across more than 10,000 procedures. SpecialtyCare is accredited and certified by The Joint Commission.

Two of those facts bear directly on the questions above. A requirement that in-room clinicians hold CNIM, rather than an encouragement, is a policy choice a hospital can verify. And employed rather than contracted supervising physicians make the concurrency question answerable, because a single organization controls the assignment.

Ask SpecialtyCare, and ask every provider you evaluate, for the concurrency number in writing. Contact SpecialtyCare to discuss how supervision is structured for your case mix.

Frequently asked questions

How many cases can one IONM supervising professional oversee at the same time? The current ASNM professional practice guideline sets no numeric limit. It states that oversight of concurrent surgical procedures is anticipated, that the professional “must judge his or her maximum capacity based on the mix of case complexity and other factors such as connectivity,” that sufficient attention must be apportioned so that all duties are maintained for all cases, and that cases of greater complexity may require personal attendance in the operating room. Because the standard is self-judgment, hospitals that want a specific ceiling need to set it contractually.

Does the IONM supervising professional have to be a physician? Not under the ASNM guideline. It states that the professional engages in IONM as a patient care activity “whether or not the IONM-P is a physician or other qualified healthcare professional practitioner,” while also recognizing, citing AMA policy H-410.957, that professional-level IONM constitutes the practice of medicine. The guideline requires compliance with state scope of practice and licensure law and requires relevant board certification. Hospitals wanting physician-only supervision should specify it.

What are the technical requirements for remote IONM supervision? The ASNM guideline expects that when the professional is not in the operative suite, a continuous, HIPAA-compliant feed of all live data being recorded is available for contemporaneous interpretation, and that at minimum direct voice access is available for communication with the surgical team. It does not require video of the operating room and does not specify a maximum response time, so hospitals commonly add both by contract.

Why does Medicare have a separate code for remote IONM? CMS created HCPCS code G0453, effective January 1, 2013, in response to concerns about CPT code 95941, which allows a physician to monitor multiple Medicare beneficiaries simultaneously. G0453 may be billed only for undivided attention by the monitoring physician to a single beneficiary, and not for simultaneous attention to more than one patient. CPT 95941 is not valid for submission to Medicare.

How is time counted for HCPCS G0453? It is a timed code billed in 15-minute units, with no more than four units in a 60-minute period, and total billed units may not exceed the total time available. A physician may bill one unit when at least eight minutes of monitoring of a single beneficiary are furnished. Non-continuous time directed at one patient during a single session may be summed, and the first 15-minute unit must be completed before the second begins.

What should an IONM report contain? The ASNM guideline specifies eight elements: identification of the patient, surgeon, and IONM care team; the surgical procedures performed; the modalities recorded with a description of baseline responses; neural topographical or neuro-navigational data where applicable; details of any significant changes in responses; interventional measures recommended where injury was a concern; final responses obtained; and details of post-operative neurological status where possible and relevant.

Should our medical staff office credential the remote supervising professional? The guideline expects it. It states that the qualified professional is always expected to maintain appropriate hospital credentialing and privileges at all facilities where they perform these duties, with exceptions contemplated only for unexpected or emergent situations, and it strongly encourages hospitals to demand evidence of board certification, training, experience, licensure, and continuing education when evaluating those requests. Because the supervising professional practices where the patient is, state licensure should match the state where the surgery occurs.

Sources

Author

Related Posts